Morphological Physiognomic of Divyang Cricketers in West Bengal: A Pilot Study

Subhashis Biswas
Department of Physical Education and Yoga, ICFAI University, Tripura, India
Madhab Chandra Ghosh
Department of Physical Education and Yoga, ICFAI University, Tripura, India
Mukesh Kumar Verma
Department of Physical Education and Social Science, NCERT, New Delhi, India

Published 20-08-2025

Keywords

  • Divyang cricket,
  • Inclusive sports,
  • Anthropometry,
  • Somatotype,
  • Body composition

How to Cite

Biswas, S., Ghosh, M. C., & Verma, M. K. (2025). Morphological Physiognomic of Divyang Cricketers in West Bengal: A Pilot Study. International Journal of Kinanthropometry, 5(2), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.34256/ijk2529

Dimensions

Abstract

Introduction: Morphological characteristics play a crucial role in determining performance, positional specialization and injury susceptibility in cricket. While extensive anthropometric profiling has been conducted on mainstream cricketers, limited research has examined Divyang (differently-abled) athletes, despite their increasing participation at competitive levels. This study aimed to investigate the morphological characteristics of Divyang cricketers in West Bengal. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted with 17 male Divyang cricketers (aged 17–36 years) representing West Bengal. Standardized ISAK protocols were used to measure body size, skinfolds, girths and bone breadths. Body composition was estimated and somatotype components were derived using the Heath-Carter method.  Results: Batsmen presented with higher body mass (71.4±10.7 kg), BMI (25.38±2.4 kg/m²), body fat percentage (19.9±1.5%), and endomorphy (4.91±0.4), reflecting greater adiposity and muscularity. Bowlers were leaner with lower BMI (19.38±0.9 kg/m²), reduced fat percentage (10.3±3.7%) and higher ectomorphy (3.99±0.4), while all-rounders displayed balanced mesomorphic dominance (4.47±0.4) with moderate adiposity. Somatoplot analysis revealed clustering toward central mesomorphy suggesting limited morphological dispersion compared to mainstream cricket. Discussion: The study revealed Divyang cricketers demonstrate less role-specific somatotype differentiation, with functional efficiency and adaptability taking precedence over positional specialization. Moderate mesomorphic dominance provides muscularity necessary for cricket-specific tasks, while elevated endomorphic expression reflects mobility limitations and lower access to structured conditioning systems. Conclusion: Divyang cricketers in West Bengal predominantly exhibit mesomorphic tendencies with positional variations but reduced morphological diversity compared to mainstream cricketers. These insights highlight the importance of disability-sensitive conditioning, nutritional strategies and targeted training programs to enhance performance and reduce injury risks.

References

  1. Bawari, B., Adhikari, R., Easow, J., Pullinger, S.A. (2023). Somatotype and Body Composition of Indian Male and Female Swimmers, and their Relationship to Countermovement Jump Performance. International Journal of Kinanthropometry, 3(2): 84–95. https://doi.org/10.34256/ijk23210
  2. Biswas, A., Ghosh, A.K. (2020). Anthropometric profile of district level cricketers of west Bengal. International Journal of Physical Education, Sports and Health, 7(5): 240–244. https://doi.org/10.22271/kheljournal.2021.v8.i6d.3210
  3. Biswas, S., Biswas, A. (2021). Somatotype of Regional Cricketers of West Bengal in India. European Journal of Sports Exercise Science, 9(3): 11–17. https://www.scholarsresearchlibrary.com/articles/somatotype-of-regional-cricketers-of-west-bengal-in-india.pdf
  4. Carter, J.E.L. (2002). Part 1: The Heath-Carter anthropometric somatotype-instruction manual. Department of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences San Diego State University, 1-26.
  5. Cherif, M., Said, M.A., Bannour, K., Alhumaid, M.M., Chaifa, M. Ben, Khammassi, M., Aouidet, A. (2022). Anthropometry, body composition, and athletic performance in specific field tests in Paralympic athletes with different disabilities. Heliyon, 8(3): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09023
  6. Dhar, K., Farooque, S.M., Gogoi, S.K. (2021). Somatotype profile of the state level cricketers of Tripura. International Journal of Physical Education, Sports and Health, 8(6): 240–244. https://doi.org/10.22271/kheljournal.2021.v8.i6d.3210
  7. Dingley, A.A., Pyne, D.B., Burkett, B. (2015). Relationships between Propulsion and Anthropometry in Paralympic Swimmers. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 10(8): 978–985. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2014-0186
  8. Goosey-Tolfrey, V. (2010). Supporting the paralympic athlete: focus on wheeled sports. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(26), 2237–2243. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2010.491577
  9. Carter, J.L., Heath, B.H. (1990). Somatotyping: development and applications Cambridge university press, 5.
  10. Esparza-Ros, F., Vaquero-Cristóbal, R., Marfell-Jones, M. (2019). International standards for anthropometric assessment. International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK).
  11. Khadilkar, V.V, Khadilkar, A.V. (2015). Revised Indian Academy of Pediatrics 2015 growth charts for height, weight and body mass index for 5-18-year-old Indian children. Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 19(4): 470. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.159028
  12. Kitchin, P.J., Howe, P.D. (2014). The mainstreaming of disability cricket in England and Wales: Integration ‘One Game’ at a time. Sport Management Review, 17(1): 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2013.05.003
  13. Koley, S. (2011). A study of anthropometric profile of indian inter-university male cricketers. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 6(2): 427–435. http://dx.doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2011.62.23
  14. Lemos, V.D.A., Alves, E.D.S., Schwingel, P.A., Rosa, J.P.P., Silva, A. Da, Winckler, C., Vital, R., De Almeida, A.A., Tufik, S., De Mello, M.T. (2016). Analysis of the body composition of Paralympic athletes: Comparison of two methods. European Journal of Sport Science, 16(8): 955–964. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2016.1194895
  15. Molik, B., Laskin, J.J., Kosmol, A., Marszałek, J., Morgulec-Adamowicz, N., Frick, T. (2018). Relationships between anaerobic performance, field tests, and functional level of elite female wheelchair basketball athletes. Human Movement, 14(4): 366–371. https://doi.org/10.2478/humo-2013-0045
  16. Norton, K., Olds, T., Olive, S., Craig, N. (1996). Anthropometry and sports performance. Anthropometrica, 1: 287-364.
  17. Peacock, B. (2003). What Kind of Shape Are You In? Anthropometry and Appearances. Ergonomics in Design, 11(1): 4-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/106480460301100102
  18. Sarabia, J.M., Doménech, C., Roche, E., Vicente-Salar, N., Reina, R. (2020). Anthropometrical Features of Para-Footballers According to Their Cerebral Palsy Profiles and Compared to Controls. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(23): 9071. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17239071
  19. Silva, D.A.S., Petroski, E.L., Araujo Gaya, A.C. (2013). Anthropometric and Physical Fitness Differences among Brazilian Adolescents who Practise Different Team Court Sports. Journal of Human Kinetics, 36(1): 77.
  20. Stuelcken, M., Pyne, D., Sinclair, P. (2007). Anthropometric characteristics of elite cricket fast bowlers. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(14): 1587–1597. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410701275185