ISAK Home

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Volume 3, Issue 1, Year 2023

Articles

Anthropometric Characteristics and Somatotype of Elite Indian Boxers

  • Yumnam Momo Singh,
  • Anurag Chaurasia,
  • Sukhdeep Singh Kang
Yumnam Momo Singh
Scientific Officer, Department of Sports Anthropometry, SAI NSNIS Patiala, India
Anurag Chaurasia
Performance Analyst, Department of Sports Anthropometry, SAI CRC Bhopal, India
Sukhdeep Singh Kang
Jr. Scientific Officer, Department of Sports Anthropometry, SAI NSNIS Patiala, India
PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34256/ijk23114

Published 30-06-2023

Keywords

  • Anthropometric variables,
  • Endomorphy,
  • Mesomorphy,
  • Ectomorphy

How to Cite

Singh, Y. M., Chaurasia, A., & Kang, S. S. (2023). Anthropometric Characteristics and Somatotype of Elite Indian Boxers. International Journal of Kinanthropometry, 3(1), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.34256/ijk23114

Copyright (c) 2023 Yumnam Momo Singh, Anurag Chaurasia, Sukhdeep Singh Kang

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Dimensions

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Introduction: Limited research exists on the anthropometric characteristics and somatotypes of elite Indian male boxers, motivating this study to fill the gap and provide insights into the variations across weight categories for talent identification and performance enhancement in Indian boxing. The study aimed to examine variations in anthropometric characteristics and somatotypes of elite Indian boxers in three different weight categories: light weight boxers (< 60 kg), middle weight boxers (61-74 kg), and heavy weight boxers (> 75 kg). Methods: Data were collected from 35 elite Indian male boxers with age ranges from 19 - 29 years at NSNIS, Patiala during the boxing national camp 2021. Anthropometric variables were measured following the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK) standardized methods, Heath and Carter’s somatotype equation were used for somatotype calculation. Results: Mean height, weight and somatotype of the elite Indian male boxers were 175.2 ± 8.4, 69 ± 15.3 and 2.3 ± 1.0 – 4.9 ± 0.9 – 2.9 ± 1.1 respectively. Conclusions:  Light weight boxers are ectomorphic mesomorph, middle weight boxers are balanced mesomorph and heavy weight boxers are endomorphic mesomorph with greater height and BMI.

PDF

References

  1. Berry, J.N. (1972). Somatotype distribution in male college students in northern India. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 36(1): 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330360110
  2. Bertini, I., Pujia, A., & Giampietro, M. (2003). A follow-up study of the variations in the body composition of karate athletes. Acta Diabetologica, 40(SUPPL. 1): 16–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-003-0048-4
  3. Biswas, A., & Ghosh, A.K. (2020). Anthropometric profile of district-level cricketers of West Bengal. International Journal of Physical Education, Sports and Health, 7(5): 240–244.
  4. Bonilla, D.A., De León, L.G., Alexander-Cortez, P., Odriozola-Martínez, A., Herrera-Amante, C.A., Vargas-Molina, S., & Petro, J.L. (2021). Simple anthropometry-based calculations to monitor body composition in athletes: Scoping review and reference values. Nutrition and Health. 28(1): 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060211002941
  5. Carter J & Heath B. (1990). Somatotyping: development and applications, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.
  6. Carter, J.E.L., Ackland, T.R., Kerr, D.A., & Stapff, A.B. (2005). Somatotype and size of elite female basketball players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(10): 1057–1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410400023233
  7. Chandra Saha, G. (2012). Comparative Study of Anthropometric Measurements and Body Composition among Individual and Team Game. International Journal of Behavioural Social and Movement Sciences, 1(3): 69-73.
  8. Davis, P., & Beneke, R. (2016). Anthropometric Parameters of Amateur Boxers: Comparability and Sensitivity of Equations used to Calculate Body Density. Journal of Combat Sports and Martial Arts, 7(2): 109–116.
  9. Gakhar, I., & Malik, S. (2002). Age Changes and Sex Differences in Somatotypes among Jats of Delhi. The Anthropologist, 4(2): 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2002.11890737
  10. Gualdi-Russo, E., & Graziani, I. (1993). Anthropometric somatotype of Italian sport participants. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 33(3): 282–291.
  11. Gupta, A., Gupta, O., Mitra, M., & Venugopal, R. (2011). A cross-sectional study of anthropometric somatotype in women players of Chhattisgarh. International Journal of Fitness, 7(2): 65–72.
  12. Heath, B.H. & Carter, J.E.L. (1967). A modified somatotype method. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 27(1): 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330270108
  13. Hume, P., & Marfell-Jones, M. (2008). The importance of accurate site location for skinfold measurement. Journal of sports sciences, 26(12): 1333-1340. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410802165707
  14. ISAK Manual (2019). International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment. International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry. Edited by: Francisco Esparza-Ros, Raquel Vaquero-Cristóbal, Michael MarfellJones, UCAM Universidad Católica de Murcia, Spain.
  15. Keogh, J. W. L., Hume, P. A., Pearson, S. N., & Mellow, P. (2007b). Anthropometric dimensions of male powerlifters of varying body mass. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(12): 1365–1376. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410601059630
  16. Keogh, J.W.L., Hume, P.A., Pearson, S.N., & Mellow, P. (2007a). Anthropometric dimensions of male powerlifters of varying body mass. Journal of Sports Sciences, 37–41.
  17. Kevin Norton and Tim Olds. (2007). Anthropometrica: A Texbook of Body Measurement for Sports and Health Education. CBS Publishers & Distributors.
  18. Lal Khanna, G., & Manna, I. (2006). Study of physiological profile of Indian boxers. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 5(CSSI-1): 90–98.
  19. Lovera, M., & Keogh, J. (2015). Anthropometric profile of powerlifters: Differences as a function of bodyweight class and competitive success. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 55(5): 478–487.
  20. Mooses, M., Jürimäe, J., Mäestu, J., Purge, P., Mooses, K., & Jürimäe, T. (2013). Anthropometric and physiological determinants of running performance in middle-and long-distance runners. Kinesiology, 45(2):154–162.
  21. Norton, K., & Eston, R. (Eds.). (2018). Kinanthropometry and exercise physiology London, Routledge United Kingdom.
  22. Ochi, E., Hamano, S., Tsuchiya, Y., Muramatsu, E., Suzukawa, K., & Igawa, S. (2015). Relationship between performance test and body composition/physical strength characteristic in sprint canoe and kayak paddlers. Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, 2015: 191-199. https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S82295
  23. Parnell, R.W. (1954). Somatotyping by physical anthropometry. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 12(2): 209–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330120218
  24. Pion, J., Segers, V., Fransen, J., Debuyck, G., Deprez, D., Haerens, L., Vaeyens, R., Philippaerts, R., & Lenoir, M. (2015). Generic anthropometric and performance characteristics among elite adolescent boys in nine different sports. In European Journal of Sport Science, 15(5): 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2014.944875
  25. Smith, S., & Norton, L. (2002). Kinanthropometry and exercise physiology laboratory manual: tests, procedures and data (2nd Edition). In Applied Ergonomics, 33(4): https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00012-1
  26. Sterkowicz-Przybycien, K., & Gualdi-Russo, E. (2019). Evaluation of somatotype in artistic gymnastics competitors: A meta-analytical approach. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 59(3): 449–455. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08332-9
  27. Sterkowicz-Przybycień, K.L., Sterkowicz, S., & Zarów, R.T. (2011). Somatotype, body composition and proportionality in polish top greco-roman wrestlers. Journal of Human Kinetics, 28(1): 141–154. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078-011-0031-z
  28. Tóth, T., Michalíková, M., Bednarčíková, L., Živčák, J., & Kneppo, P. (2014). Somatotypes in sport. Acta Mechanica et Automatica, 8(1): 27–32. https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-2014-0005