Anthropometric Characteristics and Somatotype of Elite Indian Boxers

Yumnam Momo Singh
Scientific Officer, Department of Sports Anthropometry, SAI NSNIS Patiala, India
Anurag Chaurasia
Performance Analyst, Department of Sports Anthropometry, SAI CRC Bhopal, India
Sukhdeep Singh Kang
Jr. Scientific Officer, Department of Sports Anthropometry, SAI NSNIS Patiala, India

Publicado 30-06-2023

Palabras clave

  • Variables antropométricas,
  • Endomorfia,
  • Mesomorfia,
  • Ectomorfia

Cómo citar

Singh, Y. M., Chaurasia, A., & Kang, S. S. (2023). Anthropometric Characteristics and Somatotype of Elite Indian Boxers. La Revista Internacional De Cineantropometría, 3(1), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.34256/ijk23114

Dimensions

Resumen

Introducción: existe una investigación limitada sobre las características antropométricas y los somatotipos de los boxeadores masculinos indios de élite, lo que motiva este estudio para llenar el vacío y proporcionar información sobre las variaciones entre las categorías de peso para la identificación de talentos y la mejora del rendimiento en el boxeo indio. El estudio tuvo como objetivo examinar las variaciones en las características antropométricas y los somatotipos de los boxeadores indios de élite en tres categorías de peso diferentes: boxeadores de peso ligero (< 60 kg), boxeadores de peso medio (61-74 kg) y boxeadores de peso pesado (> 75 kg). Métodos: se recopilaron datos de 35 boxeadores indios de élite con rangos de edad de 19 a 29 años en NSNIS, Patiala durante el campamento nacional de boxeo 2021. Las variables antropométricas se midieron siguiendo los métodos estandarizados de la Sociedad Internacional para el Avance de la Cineantropometría (ISAK), Heath y la ecuación de somatotipo de Carter se utilizaron para el cálculo del somatotipo. Resultados: La altura, el peso y el somatotipo medios de los boxeadores masculinos indios de élite fueron 175,2 ± 8,4, 69 ± 15,3 y 2,3 ± 1,0 – 4,9 ± 0,9 – 2,9 ± 1,1 respectivamente. Conclusiones: Los boxeadores de peso ligero son mesomorfos ectomorfos, los boxeadores de peso medio son mesomorfos equilibrados y los boxeadores de peso pesado son mesomorfos endomórficos con mayor talla e IMC.

Citas

  1. Berry, J.N. (1972). Somatotype distribution in male college students in northern India. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 36(1): 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330360110
  2. Bertini, I., Pujia, A., & Giampietro, M. (2003). A follow-up study of the variations in the body composition of karate athletes. Acta Diabetologica, 40(SUPPL. 1): 16–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-003-0048-4
  3. Biswas, A., & Ghosh, A.K. (2020). Anthropometric profile of district-level cricketers of West Bengal. International Journal of Physical Education, Sports and Health, 7(5): 240–244.
  4. Bonilla, D.A., De León, L.G., Alexander-Cortez, P., Odriozola-Martínez, A., Herrera-Amante, C.A., Vargas-Molina, S., & Petro, J.L. (2021). Simple anthropometry-based calculations to monitor body composition in athletes: Scoping review and reference values. Nutrition and Health. 28(1): 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060211002941
  5. Carter J & Heath B. (1990). Somatotyping: development and applications, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.
  6. Carter, J.E.L., Ackland, T.R., Kerr, D.A., & Stapff, A.B. (2005). Somatotype and size of elite female basketball players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(10): 1057–1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410400023233
  7. Chandra Saha, G. (2012). Comparative Study of Anthropometric Measurements and Body Composition among Individual and Team Game. International Journal of Behavioural Social and Movement Sciences, 1(3): 69-73.
  8. Davis, P., & Beneke, R. (2016). Anthropometric Parameters of Amateur Boxers: Comparability and Sensitivity of Equations used to Calculate Body Density. Journal of Combat Sports and Martial Arts, 7(2): 109–116.
  9. Gakhar, I., & Malik, S. (2002). Age Changes and Sex Differences in Somatotypes among Jats of Delhi. The Anthropologist, 4(2): 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2002.11890737
  10. Gualdi-Russo, E., & Graziani, I. (1993). Anthropometric somatotype of Italian sport participants. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 33(3): 282–291.
  11. Gupta, A., Gupta, O., Mitra, M., & Venugopal, R. (2011). A cross-sectional study of anthropometric somatotype in women players of Chhattisgarh. International Journal of Fitness, 7(2): 65–72.
  12. Heath, B.H. & Carter, J.E.L. (1967). A modified somatotype method. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 27(1): 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330270108
  13. Hume, P., & Marfell-Jones, M. (2008). The importance of accurate site location for skinfold measurement. Journal of sports sciences, 26(12): 1333-1340. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410802165707
  14. ISAK Manual (2019). International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment. International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry. Edited by: Francisco Esparza-Ros, Raquel Vaquero-Cristóbal, Michael MarfellJones, UCAM Universidad Católica de Murcia, Spain.
  15. Keogh, J. W. L., Hume, P. A., Pearson, S. N., & Mellow, P. (2007b). Anthropometric dimensions of male powerlifters of varying body mass. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(12): 1365–1376. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410601059630
  16. Keogh, J.W.L., Hume, P.A., Pearson, S.N., & Mellow, P. (2007a). Anthropometric dimensions of male powerlifters of varying body mass. Journal of Sports Sciences, 37–41.
  17. Kevin Norton and Tim Olds. (2007). Anthropometrica: A Texbook of Body Measurement for Sports and Health Education. CBS Publishers & Distributors.
  18. Lal Khanna, G., & Manna, I. (2006). Study of physiological profile of Indian boxers. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 5(CSSI-1): 90–98.
  19. Lovera, M., & Keogh, J. (2015). Anthropometric profile of powerlifters: Differences as a function of bodyweight class and competitive success. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 55(5): 478–487.
  20. Mooses, M., Jürimäe, J., Mäestu, J., Purge, P., Mooses, K., & Jürimäe, T. (2013). Anthropometric and physiological determinants of running performance in middle-and long-distance runners. Kinesiology, 45(2):154–162.
  21. Norton, K., & Eston, R. (Eds.). (2018). Kinanthropometry and exercise physiology London, Routledge United Kingdom.
  22. Ochi, E., Hamano, S., Tsuchiya, Y., Muramatsu, E., Suzukawa, K., & Igawa, S. (2015). Relationship between performance test and body composition/physical strength characteristic in sprint canoe and kayak paddlers. Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, 2015: 191-199. https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S82295
  23. Parnell, R.W. (1954). Somatotyping by physical anthropometry. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 12(2): 209–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330120218
  24. Pion, J., Segers, V., Fransen, J., Debuyck, G., Deprez, D., Haerens, L., Vaeyens, R., Philippaerts, R., & Lenoir, M. (2015). Generic anthropometric and performance characteristics among elite adolescent boys in nine different sports. In European Journal of Sport Science, 15(5): 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2014.944875
  25. Smith, S., & Norton, L. (2002). Kinanthropometry and exercise physiology laboratory manual: tests, procedures and data (2nd Edition). In Applied Ergonomics, 33(4): https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00012-1
  26. Sterkowicz-Przybycien, K., & Gualdi-Russo, E. (2019). Evaluation of somatotype in artistic gymnastics competitors: A meta-analytical approach. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 59(3): 449–455. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08332-9
  27. Sterkowicz-Przybycień, K.L., Sterkowicz, S., & Zarów, R.T. (2011). Somatotype, body composition and proportionality in polish top greco-roman wrestlers. Journal of Human Kinetics, 28(1): 141–154. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078-011-0031-z
  28. Tóth, T., Michalíková, M., Bednarčíková, L., Živčák, J., & Kneppo, P. (2014). Somatotypes in sport. Acta Mechanica et Automatica, 8(1): 27–32. https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-2014-0005