Impact of Socio-Economic Status on Anthropometric Characteristics and Somatotype in Male Aborigine Santal People of West Bengal, India

Riya Ghosh
Universal Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Bhairahawa, Nepal
Anup Adhikari
Anthropometrica, Toronto, Canada

Published 16-12-2025

Keywords

  • Socio-Economic Status,
  • Somatotype,
  • Santal,
  • Aborigine,
  • Muscularity

How to Cite

Ghosh, R., & Adhikari, A. (2025). Impact of Socio-Economic Status on Anthropometric Characteristics and Somatotype in Male Aborigine Santal People of West Bengal, India. International Journal of Kinanthropometry, 5(3), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.34256/ijk2538

Dimensions

Abstract

Introduction: Socioeconomic Status represents the economic and social condition of a person or a family in respect of income, education and profession or occupation. Socioeconomic status reflects the economic or wealth level besides social position which influence health, education and overall wellbeing. The present study was aimed to find out the impact of Socio-economic status on male Aborigine Santal population of India. Methods: 65 Santal aborigine male from rural areas of West Bengal province of India were measured for their physical characteristics and somatotyping. The Socio-economic status of these Santal males were in Poor category of Upper Lower class or Lower Class according Kuppuswamy Scale of classification. Results: The average Somatotype of Upper Lower class Santals was 2.4 (±1.6) - 4.0 (±0.9) -3.0(±1.1) whereas that of Lower class was 2.0(±0.5) -2.4(±02) -2.7(±0.4). Conclusion: Less muscularity was observed in Lower Claas people compare to Upper lower class. This might be due pooe nutrition along with less intake of proten in food. Thus, Socio-economic status has impact on anthropometrical measurement and somatype. More studies are required for other population of same socio-economic status.

References

  1. Adhikari, A., Dash, K. (2020). Somatotype of santal tribal women of West Bengal in India. Journal of the Anthropological Survey of India, 69(1): 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277436x20927229
  2. Adhikari, A., Ghosh, R. (2025). Somatotype characteristics and nutritional status of santal aboorigine females in India. International Journal of Kinanthropometry, 5(2): 96–99. https://doi.org/10.34256/ijk25212
  3. Adhikari, A., Pathak, P., Dash, K. (2021). Equity and disparity in somatotype characteristics of Muslim women of two different places with similar socio-economic but different socio-cultural practice. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 8(2): 797. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20210240
  4. Carter, J.E.L., Heath, B.H. (1990). Somatotyping: Development and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Cavallaro, F., Rahman, T. (2009). The Santals of Bangladesh .The Linguistics Journal – (Special Edition), 194-220.
  6. Chaudhary, A.K., Murmu, S.S. (2024). Socio-Economic Condition of Santhal Tribe in Pakur District, Jharkhand, International Journal of Novel Research and Development, 9(6). https://www.ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2406345.pdf
  7. Das, K., Mukherjee, K., Ganguli, S., Pal, S., Bagchi,S.S. (2021). The association between somatotype and nutritional status: a cross-sectional study among the adult Sabar males of Purulia, West Bengal, India. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology, 5: 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41257-021-00046-5
  8. Das, M. B., Roy, K.S. (2013). Rural-Urban Differences in Nutritional Status and Physical Body Dimensions of Adult Santal Males of West Bengal. International Journal of Anthropology, 28(4).
  9. Dash, K., Adhikari, A. (2017). Comparison of nutritional status between Santal tribal women and Bengali women of Purba Medinipu. Vidyasagar University, West Bengal. Indian Journal of Biological Sciences, 23:24-33.http://vu.dspaces.org/bitstream/123456789/5181/1/Keya%20Dash.pdf
  10. Dhargupta, A., Goswami, A., Sen, M., Mazumder, D. (2009). Study on the effect of socio-economic parameters on health status of the Toto, Santal, Sabar and Lodha tribes of West Bengal, India. Studies of Tribes and Tribals, 7(1): 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972639X.2009.11886592
  11. Esparza-Ros, F., Vaquero-Cristóbal, R., & Marfell-Jones, M. (2019). International standards for anthropometric assessment. International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK).
  12. Ghosh, S. (2022). A comparative analysis of dietary intake and body composition among two ethnically distinct tribal populations from India. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 76(10): 1423-1431. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-022-01121-6
  13. Ghosh, S., Malik, S.L. (2007). Parent-offspring correlations in body measurements, physique and physiological variables among Santhals of West Bengal. Journal of Exercise Science and Physiotherapy, 3(1): 26-43. https://search.informit.org/doi/pdf/10.3316/informit.865343634342270
  14. Heath, B.H., Carter. J.L. (1967). A modified Somatotype method, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 27(1):57-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330270108
  15. Lareau, A. (2011). Unequal childhoods: Race, class, and family life. University of California Press.
  16. Maharana, R., Patel, S.P. (2018). The santhal: socio-economic miserable condition and quality of life (An overview of Bantali Rakhasahi village, Mayurbhanj district, Odisha). IJRDO-Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 3(1): 83-102.
  17. Majumder, S. (2021). Socioeconomic status scales. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 10(11): 3964–3967. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_600_21
  18. Mandal, I., Hossain, S.R. (2025). Modified Kuppuswamy scale updated for the year 2025. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 12(5): 2423–2425. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20251411
  19. Mukherjee, S., Malik, U.S. (2020). Socio-ecological niche of tribes of Purulia district, West Bengal, India. In Advances in Asian Human-Environmental Research, 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49115-4_10