ISAK Home

Vol. 2 Núm. 2 (2022): Volume 2, Issue 2, Year 2022

Articles

Comparison of Complex and Simple Anthropometrics in the Descriptive Anthropometric Assessment of Male Cyclists

  • Alice M Bullas,
  • Simon Choppin,
  • Ben Heller,
  • Jon Wheat
Alice M Bullas
Centre for Sports Engineering Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Simon Choppin
Centre for Sports Engineering Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Ben Heller
Centre for Sports Engineering Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Jon Wheat
Academy of Sport & Physical Activity, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
PDF (English)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34256/ijk2222

Publicado 31-12-2022

Palabras clave

  • Imágenes de superficie 3D,
  • Antropometría,
  • Escaneo Corporal,
  • Ciclismo,
  • Medida Corporal

Cómo citar

Bullas, A. M., Choppin, S., Heller, B., & Wheat, J. (2022). Comparison of Complex and Simple Anthropometrics in the Descriptive Anthropometric Assessment of Male Cyclists. La Revista Internacional De Cineantropometría, 2(2), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.34256/ijk2222

Derechos de autor 2022 Alice M Bullas, Simon Choppin, Ben Heller, Jon Wheat

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Dimensions

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Resumen

Introducción: Comparar la importancia de la antropometría superficial compleja (áreas y volúmenes) y simple (largos y perímetros) en la valoración antropométrica descriptiva del tren inferior de ciclistas masculinos de diferentes disciplinas. Método: utilizando un sistema de imágenes de superficie 3D 3dMDBody5 y un software personalizado (KinAnthroScan), antropometría de la parte inferior del cuerpo de 23 no ciclistas masculinos y 57 ciclistas masculinos de élite de diferentes disciplinas ciclistas: sprint (pista y ruta (colina)), resistencia (carretera, > 50 millas), contrarreloj (carretera, < 50 millas) y bicicleta de montaña (cross-country y enduro). Resultados: Varias medidas antropométricas difirieron entre los grupos de ciclistas y cuando se compararon con el grupo de no ciclistas; el grupo de velocidad demostró la mayor magnitud de diferencia con otras disciplinas ciclistas y el grupo de no ciclistas, mientras que los grupos de contrarreloj y bicicleta de montaña demostraron la menor. La antropometría compleja fue capaz de distinguir entre grupos con tanta eficacia como la antropometría simple y, en algunos casos, pudo distinguir diferencias que no eran identificables solo con antropometría simple. Conclusiones: Los investigadores, antropometristas y profesionales deben considerar la recopilación y el uso de antropometría compleja para mejorar la comprensión de las diferencias antropométricas dentro de la antropometría descriptiva, además de tener cuidado al investigar grupos de ciclistas de diferentes disciplinas debido a sus diferentes perfiles antropométricos, clasificándolos por disciplina cuando posible.

PDF (English)

Citas

  1. Allied Market Research, 3D Scanning Market Outlook–2030. Available online: https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/3Dscanning-market (accessed on 1 June 2022).
  2. Astrand, P.O., Rodahl, K. (1977). Evaluation of physical work capacity on the basis of tests. Textbook of Work Physiology. McGee Raw Hill, New York
  3. Ballester, A., Pierola, A., Parrilla, E., Uriel, J., Ruescas, A.V., Perez, C., Alemany, S. (2018). 3D Human Models from 1D, 2D and 3D Inputs: Reliability and Compatibility of Body Measurements, In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on 3D Body Scanning Technologies, Lugano, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.15221/18.132
  4. Bini, R. (2011). Effects of saddle position on pedalling technique and methods to assess pedalling kinetics and kinematics of cyclists and triathletes. Auckland University of Technology Library.
  5. Borms, J. (2008). Directory of sport science: A journey through time: the changing face of ICSSPE. Human Kinetics.
  6. Bullas, A.M., Choppin, S., Heller, B., Wheat, J. (2022). Validation of a 3dMDbody5 imaging system for the determination of anthropometrics. Poster presented at XVII World Conference on Kinanthropometry, Spain.
  7. Bullas, A.M., Choppin, S.B., Heller, B., Wheat, J.S. (2016). Validity and repeatability of a depth camera based 3D surface imaging system for thigh volume measurement. Journal of Sports Sciences, 34(20): 1998-2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1149604
  8. Carpes, F.P., Mota, C.B., Faria, I.E. (2010). On the bilateral asymmetry during running and cycling - A review considering leg preference. Physical Therapy in Sport, 11(4): 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2010.06.005
  9. Clarkson, S., Wheat, J., Heller, B., Chopin, S. (2015). Assessment of a Microsoft Kinect-based 3D scanning system for taking body segment girth measurements: a comparison to ISAK and ISO standards. Journal of Sports Sciences, 34(11): 1006-1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2015.1085075
  10. Clarkson, S., Wheat, J., Heller, B., & Choppin, S. (2014, September). Assessing the suitability of the Microsoft Kinect for calculating person specific body segment parameters. In European Conference on Computer Vision Springer, Cham.
  11. Daanen, H.A.M., Levels, K., Vonk, L., Bosman, W., Schnepper, Y., Ter Haar, F.B. (2016). Changes in the Volume and Circumference of the Torso, Leg and Arm after Cycling in the Heat Determined Using 3D Whole Body Scanners. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on 3D Body Scanning Technologies, Lugano, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.15221/16.045
  12. Daniell, N., Olds, T., Tomkinson, G. (2013). Volumetric differences in body shape among adults with differing body mass index values: An analysis using three-dimensional body scans. American Journal of Human Biology, 26(2): 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.22490
  13. Dellanini, L., Hawkins, D., Martin, B., Stover, S. (2004). The effects of changing bone and muscle size on limb inertial properties and limb dynamics: a computer simulation. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 7(3): 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255840410001727823
  14. Drinkwater, E., Hopkins, W.G., McKenna, M., Hunt, P., Pyne, D. (2007). Modelling age and secular differences in fitness between basketball players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(8): 869–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255840410001727823
  15. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage publications, London.
  16. Foley, J.P., Bird, S.R., White, J.A. (1989). Anthropometric comparison of cyclists from different events. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 23(1): 30-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.23.1.30
  17. Haakonssen, E.C., Martin, D.T., Jenkins D.G., Burke L.M. (2015). Race weight: Perceptions of elite female road cyclists. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 10(3): 311–317. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2014-0070
  18. Hedges, L.V, Olkin, I. (2014). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press, New York.
  19. Hopker, J., Coleman, D., Jobson, S.A., & Passfield, L. (2012). Inverse relationship between V O2max and gross efficiency. International journal of sports medicine, 33(10), 789-794. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-00000028
  20. IPAQ Research Committee. (2005). International physical activity questionnaire: Short last 7 days self-administered format.
  21. Knapp, B. (1963). Skill in sport: the attainment of proficiency. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
  22. Koley, S., Jain, V.K. (2013). Correlations of maximal oxygen consumption with selected anthropometric and physical characteristics in elite Indian cyclists. Annals of Biological Research, 4(4): 134–138.
  23. Kordi, M., Haralabidis, N., Huby, M., Barratt, P.R., Howatson, G., Wheat, J.S. (2019). Reliability and validity of depth camera 3D scanning to determine thigh volume. Journal of Sports Sciences, 37(1): 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2018.1480857
  24. Kordi, M., Menzies, C., Parker, L. (2018). Relationship between power – duration parameters and mechanical and anthropometric properties of the thigh in elite cyclists. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 118, 637–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3807-1
  25. Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4: 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
  26. Moller, A.P., (1993). Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in sexual ornamentsnpredict female choice. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 6:481-491. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1993.6040481.x
  27. Norton, K., Olds T. (2001). Morphological Evolution of Athletes Over the 20th Century Causes and Consequences. Sports Medicine, 31(11): 763–783. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200131110-00001
  28. Norton, K., Olds, T., Olive, S., & Craig, N. (1996). Anthropometry and sports performance. Anthropometrica, 287-364.
  29. Olds, T. (2004). The rise and fall of anthropometry. Journal of Sport Science, 22(4): 319-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410310001641593
  30. Olds ,T. (2009). Anthropometry. In R. J. Maughan (Ed.), The Encyclopaedia of Sports Medicine 131–148.
  31. Olds, T., & Honey, F. (2006, August). The use of 3D whole-body scanners in anthropometry. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry, Taylor & Francis.
  32. Passfield, L., Walker, M., & Barrett, P. (2012). The physiological demands of off-road cycling disciplines. Performance cycling: The science of success. London, UK.
  33. Rauter, S., Vodicar J., Simenko, J. (2017). Body Asymmetries in Young Male Road Cyclists. International Journal of Morphology, 35(3): 907–912. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022017000300018
  34. Rønnestad, B.R., Hansen, E.A., Raastad T. (2010). Effect of heavy strength training on thigh muscle cross-sectional area, performance determinants, and performance in well-trained cyclists. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 108(5): 965–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-009-1307-z
  35. Schranz, N., Tomkinson, G., Olds, T., Petkov, J., Hahn, A.G. (2012). Is three-dimensional anthropometric analysis as good as traditional anthropometric analysis in predicting junior rowing performance?, Journal of Sports Sciences, 30(12): 1241–1248. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.696204
  36. Schranz, N., Tomkinson, G., Olds, T.I.M., Daniell, N. (2010). Three-dimensional anthropometric analysis: Differences between elite Australian rowers and the general population Australian rowers and the general population. Journal of Sport Sciences, 28(5): 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640411003663284
  37. Sicotte, M., Ledoux, M., Zunzunegui, M.V., Aboubacrine, A.S., Nguyen V.K., Aboubacrine S.A., BMC. (2010). Reliability of anthropometric measures in a longitudinal cohort of patients initiating ART in West Africa. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10(1): 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-102
  38. Smith, J. L., McManus, A. (2009). A Review on Transitional Implications for Retiring Elite Athletes: What Happens When the Spotlight Dims?, The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 1(1), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.2174/1875399X00801010045
  39. Stewart, A.D., Marfell-Jones, M., Olds, T., De Ridder, H. (2011). International standards of anthropometric assessment. International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry.
  40. Swann, C., Moran, A., Piggott, D. (2014). Defining elite athletes: Issues in the study of expert performance in sport psychology. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16(1): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.07.004
  41. Tanner, J.M. (1964). Physique of the olympic athlete. Allen & Unwin. London.
  42. Woolstencroft, E. (2002). Talent Identification and Development: An Academic Review. The University of Edinburgh, sportscotland.
  43. Wozniak Timmer, C.A. (1991). Cycling biomechanics: a literature review. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 14(3): 106–113. https://www.jospt.org/doi/10.2519/jospt.1991.14.3.106
  44. Zifchock, R.A., Davis, I., Higginson, J., Royer, T. (2008). The symmetry angle: a novel, robust method of quantifying asymmetry. Gait & Posture, 27(4): 622–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.08.006